Zack's Geography Blog

I disagree. Except the fact that the country would be more peaceful and easy to control, the quality of life and the competition between each other would be in the lowest level. Citizen wouldn’t have the motivation to create something news which would make a society more modern and wealthy.
The Law would be:
1. Change your DNA and your children’s DNA after this law passes down immediately. Contact the government for more information. If you don’t do it, you will get death penalty immediately in any situation.
2. Any resistance or ideas against rule number 1 will be forbidden. Immediately get death penalty if disobey.
We can make laws that support the people with disadvantage like they will get better chance, education, or salary. In that way, we can push them up. We can also make laws that push the normal ones down like higher tax, harder to get in good university.
The life expectation or quality would decrease. We couldn’t stop that from happen but the citizen would accept it. Another problem was some citizens will disagree with the government and would have the ideas to go against the government. We could solve this with discipline and violence.
We could sure that someone or a group of people would come up and dominate others. A society can develop and stay together without a leader and discipline. We could know for sure that someone would organize and keep the society work well.
The first similarity was when Harrison stood up against the government and died. I always want to go against something I don’t like. And the result was always bad with some violence. The second similarity was when Hazel forgot her son was murdered on the TV right away. I also forget things easily.